Is an SMSF right for you?
As anyone who has joined the weekend crowd at Bunnings knows, Australians love DIY. And that same can-do spirit helps explain why 1.1 million Aussies choose to take control of their retirement savings with a self-managed superannuation fund (SMSF).
As well as control, investment choice is a key reason for having an SMSF. As an example, these are the only type of super funds that allows you to invest in direct property, including your small business premises. Other reasons people give are dissatisfaction with their existing fund, more flexibility to manage tax within the fund, plus greater flexibility in estate planning.
What type of person has an SMSF?
If you think SMSFs are only for wealthy older folk, think again. The average age of people establishing an SMSF has been coming down and is currently between 35 and 44. Around half of all SMSF trustees own or have owned a small business and over 50 per cent have had their fund for over 10 years. They’re also dedicated. The majority of SMSF trustees say they spend 1 to 5 hours a month monitoring their fund. But an SMSF is not for everyone. There has been an ongoing debate about how much you need to have in your SMSF to make it cost-effective and whether the returns are competitive with mainstream super funds.
So is an SMSF right for you? Here are some things to consider.
The cost of control
Running an SMSF comes with the responsibility to comply with superannuation regulations, which costs time and money. There are set-up costs and a range of ongoing administration and investment costs. These can vary enormously depending on whether you do a lot of the administration and investment yourself or outsource to professional services providers. A recent survey by Rice Warner of more than 100,000 SMSFs found that annual compliance costs ranged from $1,189 to $2,738. These are underlying costs that can’t be avoided, such as the annual ASIC fee, ATO supervisory levy, audit fee, financial statement and tax return. If trustees decide they don’t want any involvement in the administration of their fund, the cost of full administration ranges from $1,514 to $3,359. There is an even wider range of ongoing investment fees, depending on the type of investments you hold. Fees tend to be highest for funds with investment property because of the higher costs of servicing direct property and higher administration costs for accounting and auditing.
By comparison, the same report estimated annual fees for industry funds range from $445 to $6,861 for one member and $505 to $7,055 for two members. Fees for retail funds were similar. It’s worth noting that fees for SMSFs are the same whether the fund has one or two members.
Size matters
As a general principle, the higher your SMSF account balance, the more cost-effective it is to run.
According to the Rice Warner survey:
Funds with $200,000 or more in assets are cost-competitive with both industry and retail super funds, even if they fully outsource their administration
Funds with a balance of $100,000 to $200,000 may be competitive if they use one of the cheaper service providers or do some of the administration themselves.
Funds with $500,000 or more are generally the cheapest alternative.
Returns also tend to be better for funds with more than $500,000 in assets. While returns will depend on the investments in your fund, average returns for the sector have tended to lag those for other types of super funds. Even though SMSFs with a balance of under $100,000 are more expensive than industry or retail funds, they may be appropriate if you expect your balance to grow to a competitive size fairly soon. In 2019, only 8.5 per cent of SMSFs held less than $100,000 in assets. Most of these small funds tend to grow quickly via ongoing contributions, or close, once retirees in pension phase wind down their fund.
Increased responsibility
While SMSFs offer more control, that doesn’t mean you can do as you like. Every member of your SMSF has legal responsibility for ensuring the fund complies with all the relevant rules and regulations, even if you outsource some functions. SMSFs are regulated by the ATO which monitors the sector with an eagle eye and hands out penalties for rule breakers. And there are lots of rules. The most important rule is the sole purpose test, which dictates that you must run your fund with the sole purpose of providing retirement benefits for members. Fund assets must be kept separate from your personal assets and you can’t just dip into your retirement savings early when you’re short of cash.
Don’t overlook insurance
If you considering rolling the balance of an existing super fund into an SMSF, it could mean losing your life insurance cover. Large super funds often provide life cover at discounted group rates. So to ensure you and your family are not left with inadequate insurance you may need to arrange new policies. Some people leave a small amount in their previous fund to maintain their cover. If you would like to discuss your superannuation options and whether an SMSF may be suitable for you, don’t hesitate to call.
i https://www.smsfassociation.com/media-release/survey-sheds-new-insights-on-why-individuals-set-up-smsfs?at_context=50383
ii https://www.smsfassociation.com/media-release/survey-sheds-new-insights-on-why-individuals-set-up-smsfs?at_context=50383
iii https://www.ricewarner.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Cost-of-Operating-SMSFs-2020_23.11.20.pdf
iv https://www.ato.gov.au/About-ATO/Research-and-statistics/In-detail/Super-statistics/SMSF/Self-managed-super-funds--A-statistical-overview-2017-18/?anchor=Investmentprofile#Investmentprofile
